The use of Botulinum toxin in various urological conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The objective of this review paper is to comprehensively analyze and summarize the current understanding and clinical applications of Botulinum toxin in the field of urology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The materials and methods for this review paper involved an extensive literature search on the use of Botulinum toxin in urology. Multiple online databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were utilized to gather peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials, and relevant books published within the last decades. A few articles used in the review come from before 21 century because the information is essential to fully describe the topic. Studies were selected based on their relevance to the topic, with a focus on those that reported on the clinical applications of Botulinum toxin in urology - we use information from other review papers, clinical trials and research papers. To expand the database, we have looked through the literature not only in English but also other languages. Thanks to this method we were able to compare the results from different countries and scientific groups all over the world. Data extracted from these sources were then analyzed and synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of the subject matter. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: In conclusion, Botulinum toxin has shown significant promise and utility in the field of urology. Its ability to effectively relax muscles has led to its application in a variety of urological conditions, including NDO, OAB, BPS/IC, DSD, BPH, CPP, and PE. The effectiveness and safety of Botulinum toxin have been demonstrated in numerous studies, providing a robust evidence base for its clinical use. However, further research is needed to optimize the administration methods, dosage, and treatment protocols. Additionally, more randomized controlled trials are required to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of Botulinum toxin, especially for conditions for which the current data is limited. Overall, Botulinum toxin represents a valuable tool in the urologist's armamentarium and is likely to continue to be an area of active research and development in the future.

Hyperdiluted Botulinum Toxin and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment: A Case Series to Illustrate a Novel Protocol for Hypertrophic Scar Reduction.

Hypertrophic scars can have significant and far-reaching effects on patients that range from itching to creating difficulty with mobility, all of which can negatively impact the individual's quality of life. A recent study showed that many patients with recent scars report pain, burning, pruritus, erythema, in combination with psychological difficulties that impact bodily movement, choice of clothing, and participation in leisure activities. Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNTA) and intense pulsed light (IPL) have shown promise in treating such scars. We propose a novel treatment protocol involving a 4-week intervention with hyperdiluted BoNTA injections and supplemental treatment with IPL for erythema, and a 6-month scar scale assessment and photographic documentation that occurs before and 6 months after treatment. We report four cases where using hyperdiluted BoNTA, either alone or in conjunction with IPL, substantially reduced scar size, improved overall scar appearance, and diminished erythema in areas on the face and the breasts. Although this report suggests that a schedule of alternating treatments with BoNTA and IPL may be beneficial in reducing scar size and enhancing appearance, further research is necessary to better understand the most effective dosages, the relationship between BoNTA and IPL, and the optimal management of scarring.

Effects of onabotulinum toxin type A injections in patients with Meige's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Meige's syndrome is a type of facial dystonia characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia. Although botulinum toxin type A (OBTA) injections are the standard treatment, evidence of their effectiveness and safety in this scenario is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: Our research aimed to evaluate the improvement and occurrence of side effects following injections of onabotulinum toxin type A (OBTA) in patients with Meige's syndrome. METHODS: Patients with Meige's syndrome undergoing botulinum toxin injections were enrolled in this study. We assessed dystonia intensity before and 14 days after OBTA injection using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) to measure the response of symptoms in the eyes (blepharospasm) and mouth (oromandibular dystonia). Other variables, such as dosage, side effects, and demographic data, were also recorded. RESULTS: The study included 41 participants, with a mean age of 67.7 years and a female-to-male ratio of 3.5:1. The mean BFMDRS score before the injections was 8.89, and after 14 days, it was 2.88. The most reported side effect was ptosis, with a 7.3% incidence. OBTA significantly reduced dystonia severity (p < 0.0001). The clinical response for the blepharospasm component was superior to the oromandibular dystonia component. CONCLUSION: Our results support that OBTA seems to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for treating Meige's syndrome. The effect of OBTA was more pronounced in the treatment of blepharospasm than in oromandibular dystonia.

ANTECEDENTES: A síndrome de Meige (SM) é caracterizada pela ocorrência concomitante de blefarospasmo e distonia oromandibular. Embora a toxina onabotulínica do tipo A (TBA) seja o tratamento de escolha, há uma falta de evidências sobre sua eficácia e segurança nesse cenário. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do nosso estudo foi avaliar os efeitos obtidos com a aplicação de TBA em pacientes com SM. MéTODOS: Pacientes com SM que realizam aplicação de TBA foram convidados a participar desse estudo. Os participantes foram questionados sobre a intensidade da distonia antes e 14 dias após a injeção de TBA, utilizando a Escala de Distonia de Burke-Fahn-Marsden (EDBFM) para mensurar a resposta obtida em cada segmento. Outras variáveis, como dose, ocorrência de efeitos colaterais e dados demográficos, também foram registradas. RESULTADOS: O estudo contou com 41 participantes (idade média de 67,7; razão de 3,5 pacientes do sexo feminino para cada participante do sexo masculino). O escore médio na EDBFM antes das aplicações de TBA era 8,89, e, após 14 dias, 2,88. O efeito colateral mais reportado foi ptose (7.3%). A TBA foi capaz de reduzir a severidade da distonia (p < 0.0001), principalmente do blefarospasmo. CONCLUSãO: Nossos resultados corroboram que a TBA é uma terapêutica eficaz e segura no tratamento da SM. O efeito da TBA é superior no manejo do blefarospasmo em relação à distonia oromandibular.

Is bulbospongiosus muscle botox injection safe and effective in treating lifelong premature ejaculation? Randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of botulinum-A toxin injections into the bulbospongiosus muscle for cases of lifelong drug-resistant premature ejaculation (PE). METHODS: Ninety-eight outpatients diagnosed with lifelong PE were randomly assigned to two groups: the botulinum-A toxin group comprising forty-nine patients and the placebo (saline) group also consisting of forty-nine patients. A 100 U botulinum-A toxin was diluted into 10 cc of saline, with 5 cc injected into one side of the muscle (botulinum-A toxin group) guided by ultrasound to distribute across most muscle fibers. The same technique was applied using the same volume of saline injected into the bulbospongiosus muscle. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), scores from the premature ejaculation profile (PEP), Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and recording of any complications were obtained. Follow-ups occurred at 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-procedure. RESULTS: Cases receiving injections of botulinum-A toxin into the bulbospongiosus muscle showed notably extended intravaginal ejaculatory latency times compared to their initial performance after treatment. In addition, there were enhancements in PEP scores, and notably, no significant complications were reported. Conversely, the bilateral injection of saline into the bulbospongiosus muscle did not demonstrate any impact on ejaculation latencies. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the injection of botulinum-A toxin into the bulbospongiosus muscle can serve as a safe and effective option for treating PE. Nonetheless, its clinical application warrants further studies involving larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods.

Aesthetic doctors' perception and attitudes toward tolerance in botulinum toxin.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin is a crucial therapeutic tool with broad indications in both cosmetic and medical fields. However, the expanding cosmetic use and increased dosages of botulinum toxin have raised concerns about resistance, making it essential to study the awareness and management practices among healthcare professionals. METHODS: A survey was conducted among clinical physicians using botulinum toxin. The study investigated their experiences, awareness, and management practices related to toxin resistance. Real-time mobile app-based surveys were administered to clinicians attending the 45th International Academic Conference of the Korean Academy of Laser and Dermatology (KALDAT) on December 3, 2023. RESULTS: Among 3140 participants, 673 clinical physicians completed the survey. Of these, 363 clinicians (53.9%) reported experiencing botulinum toxin resistance. Regarding the resistance rate, 59.4% indicated less than 1%, 36% reported approximately 1%-25%, and 95.4% reported less than 25%. Efforts to prevent resistance included maintaining intervals of over 3 months (54.8%), using products with lower resistance potential (47.0%), employing minimal effective doses (28.2%), and minimizing re-administration (14.9%). CONCLUSION: In the South Korean aesthetic medicine community, a majority of clinical physician's report encountering botulinum toxin resistance. Given the potential loss of various benefits associated with resistance, there is a need to establish appropriate guidelines based on mechanistic studies and current status assessments. Educating clinicians on applicable guidelines is crucial.

[Rehabilitation of patients with facial nerve neuropathy in cases of increased muscle tone on the healthy side of the face]. / Reabilitatsiya patsientov s neiropatiei litsevogo nerva pri povyshenii tonusa myshts na zdorovoi storone litsa.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation (PR) and injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in the correction of muscles hypertonicity ty of the healthy side of the face or its prevention in patients with facial nerve neuropathy (FNN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-six patients with FNN of various etiologies with muscles hypertonicity of the healthy side or the risk of its development were studied. The term of treatment was 33 [10; 99] days. There are 88 women and 58 men aged 42 [34; 56] years. Diagnosis included clinical examination and stimulation electroneuromyography (ENMG, n=113; 77.4%) with assessment of M-wave amplitude asymmetry. All patients were prescribed a standard PR complex, in addition - relaxation of the muscles of the healthy side by injections of BTA (Incobotulinumtoxin A) - BTA group (n=38) or by special PR techniques - physiotherapy group (n=108). RESULTS: In both groups, patients were comparable in age, sex and severity of FNN at clinical assessment. But objectively, in the BTA group there were more symptomatic forms (63.2% vs 43.5%; p=0.038), cases of M-wave amplitude asymmetry over 90% in ≥2 branches (52.6% vs 18.5%; p=0.032). Displacement of the face midline was a factor limiting recovery (68.4% and 62%; χ2=0.495; p=0.482) in two groups. With amplitude asymmetry of more than 90% in ≥2 branches (a predictor of the risk of unfavorable outcome), a favorable outcome occurred more often in the BTA group (80% versus 45%; χ2=5.227; p=0.023). In case of amplitude asymmetry of less than 90% in all branches, a favorable outcome was observed in two groups. CONCLUSION: Indications for botulinum therapy in patients with FNN are deep prosoparesis or prosoplegia, muscles hypertonicity of the healthy side, displacement of the face midline, ENMG predictors of the risk of unfavorable outcome. PR is an effective method of prevention in patients with a favorable prognosis of outcome or treatment of mild forms.

Effects of botulinum toxin type A in the prevention and treatment of facial hypertrophic scars: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the treatment of facial hypertrophic scars. Computerised searches were performed in databases, from their inception to November 2023, including Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, focusing on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of BTX-A for treating facial hypertrophic scars. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Seventeen RCTs were ultimately included, involving 1605 patients who underwent facial cosmetic surgery. The analysis revealed that compared with conventional treatments, BTX-A significantly reduced visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.16 to -1.84, p < 0.001) and Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores (SMD: -2.86, 95% CI: -4.03 to -1.68, p < 0.001), and narrowed scar width (SMD: -1.80, 95% CI: -2.48 to -1.13, p < 0.001), while also enhancing the overall effectiveness of the treatment. This study indicates that BTX-A is an effective modality in the prophylaxis and treatment of facial hypertrophic scars, significantly alleviating scar-related pain and preventing scar widening, and is thus worthy of broader clinical application.

Spasticity Treatment Beyond Botulinum Toxins.

Botulinum toxin (BonT) is the mainstream treatment option for post-stroke spasticity. BoNT therapy may not be adequate in those with severe spasticity. There are a number of emerging treatment options for spasticity management. In this paper, we focus on innovative and revived treatment options that can be alternative or complementary to BoNT therapy, including phenol neurolysis, cryoneurolysis, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity.

According to prescribing information, potency units are not interchangeable between botulinum toxin A products. This exploratory study compared real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with upper limb spasticity. In this retrospective study, 101 clinicians provided chart data via online surveys for 215 US post-stroke patients treated for upper limb spasticity with ≥3 onabotulinumtoxinA or abobotulinumtoxinA doses (phase 1: 9/18/2020-12/10/2020; phase 2: 9/30/2021-12/7/2021). Most participating clinicians were physicians (70.3%) specializing in neurology (71.3%) or physiatry (20.8%). In the onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 107) and abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 108) groups, ∼75% of patients had moderate-to-severe spasticity. A range of onabotulinumtoxinA:abobotulinumtoxinA dose ratios (1:2.2 [95% CI: 1.8, 2.6] to 1:4.1 [95% CI: 3.0, 6.0]) was observed across muscles. For the most recent dose, mean number of muscles injected was greater for onabotulinumtoxinA (4.3) versus abobotulinumtoxinA (3.1; P = 0.0003). For onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, the proportion of injections was 81.3% versus 63.9% (P = 0.0067) in forearm muscles and 23.4% versus 3.7% (P = 0.0001) in hand muscles. Mean injection intervals were similar (onabotulinumtoxinA: 102.0 days; abobotulinumtoxinA: 99.1 days). Differences in real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity were observed. There was no standard dose-conversion ratio, consistent with each product's prescribing information.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Lacrimal Gland Botulinum Toxin Using the TEARS Score.

PURPOSE: Botulinum toxin (BoNTA) lacrimal gland injections are one treatment option for managing epiphora. Outcomes for epiphora in existing studies are subjective and lack grading. This study utilized validated grading instruments to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA lacrimal gland injections. METHODS: Prospective study evaluating the TEARS score and quality of life in patients receiving incobotulinum toxin (Xeomin) lacrimal gland injections for epiphora. Epiphora was graded using the TEARS score. Quality of life was evaluated using the watery eye quality of life score. Etiology, benefit duration, complications and additional injections were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, (median age 67.5 years), 19 (68%) had facial palsy gustatory epiphora (GE). Median effect duration was 13 weeks. Improvements in tearing frequency (T), clinical effects (E), and activity limitation (A) were seen in 57%, 57%, and 71% of patients, respectively. Median watery eye quality of life score improved from 42.4/100 ± 10.1 to 10.6 ± 15.5 (p < 0.001). Alongside crocodile tears, reflex tearing R-scores improved in 68% of patients with GE vs. 11% with non-GE causes (p = 0.004618). In total 89% of patients with GE and 56% with non-GE requested repeat injections. Self-reported percentage improvement ranged from 0% to 100% (median 60%, interquartile range 10%-76.25%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting the outcomes of BoNTA lacrimal gland injections using validated TEARS and watery eye quality of life scores. Clinical and quality of life improvements are seen in most patients. Patients with GE achieve an additional improvement in dry eye-related reflex tearing alongside crocodile tears which both improve with BoNTA. TEARS data supports using BoNTA in these patients and is a useful validated grading instrument for epiphora.

How to define failure of intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A for neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) has a major impact on patients' quality of life and can lead to upper urinary tract complications. Intradetrusor botulinum toxin type A injections are administered as second-line treatment to these patients following the failure of anticholinergic agents. The aim of the DETOX 2 study is to propose a consensus definition of the failure of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for NDO in patients presenting spinal cord injury, spina bifida, or multiple sclerosis (MS) with self-catheterization. METHOD: This study followed the method adopted by the French National Authority for Health for recommendations by consensus. Based on a review of the literature and a preliminary survey, a steering committee compiled a questionnaire and selected a rating group comprising 16 experts from the Neuro-Urology Committee of the French Urology Association (cnuAFU) and Genulf. The experts were asked to complete the online questionnaire. At the end of the first round, all participants came together to discuss any disagreements and a second-round online questionnaire was completed to reach a consensus. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 16 experts approached completed both rounds of questionnaires. A strong consensus was reached for two proposals (median score = 9/10) which were therefore included in the definition from the first round: at least one repeat injection of the same botulinum toxin at the same dose must be given to rule out failure on technical grounds and a duration of efficacy <3 months must be considered a failure. At the end of round 2, a relative consensus was reached regarding the clinical criterion defining failure (median score = 7/10) and the urodynamic criterion of failure (median score = 8/10). An additional proposal was selected during this second round on the need for a voiding diary (median score = 8/10). CONCLUSION: The first consensus definition of failure of an intradetrusor injection of TB-A for NDO has been achieved with this study: persistence of detrusor overactivity with maximum detrusor pressures >40 cm H2O and/or a compliance issue and/or persistence of urinary incontinence and/or urgency and/or a number of daily self-catheterizations >8/day and/or efficacy <3 months. This study will help to standardize research on the failure of the intradetrusor botulinum toxin for NDO in clinical practice and clinical research.

Antibiotics for UTI Prevention After Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections.

IMPORTANCE: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) occur in 8.6% to 48.1% of patients after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate both choice and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of UTI within 30 days after in-office onabotulinumtoxinA injections. STUDY DESIGN: We included a single-site, retrospective cohort of 305 patients with overactive bladder or bladder pain syndrome receiving postprocedure prophylactic antibiotics for in-office, 100-unit intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections from 2019 to 2023. Categories of antibiotic prophylaxis compared included (1) nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for 3 days, (2) nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for 5 days, (3) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg twice daily for 3 days, and (4) "other regimens." Primary outcome was incidence of UTI within 30 days. Variables were compared via χ2 test. Crude/adjusted odds were estimated using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Incidence of UTI was 10.4% for 3-day nitrofurantoin, 20.5% for 5-day nitrofurantoin, 7.4% for 3-day trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 25.7% among "other regimens" (P = 0.023). Differences among primary regimens were substantial but not statistically significant: 3-day trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had 31% lower odds of UTI versus 3-day nitrofurantoin (odds ratio [OR], 0.689; P = 0.518). Compared with 3-day nitrofurantoin regimen, the 5-day nitrofurantoin regimen had twice the odds of UTI (OR, 2.22; P = 0.088). Those receiving "other regimens" had nearly 3 times the odds of UTI (OR, 2.98; P = 0.018). Results were similar adjusting for age and race. Overall urinary retention rate was 1.97%. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antibiotic choice and duration of treatment potentially affect UTI incidence after in-office, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 3 days have the lowest UTI incidence.

OnabotulinumtoxinA: Discussion of the evidence for effectiveness of OnabotulinumA and its place in chronic migraine treatment.

OnabotulinumtoxinA is a potent inhibitor of muscle contraction that acts by preventing the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. In pain states such as migraine, its mechanism of action is not yet fully elucidated and probably relates to the phenomena of central and peripheral sensitization within the trigeminal system. Migraine is a prevalent and disabling disorder and, especially in its variant of chronic migraine (CM), is associated with relevant symptomatic and socioeconomic burden, the objective of preventive treatment being to reduce the frequency, duration, or severity of migraine attacks. OnabotulinumtoxinA, administered by intramuscular injection, is approved for the prevention of CM and is among the most utilized preventive treatments in CM and fundamental to clinical practice. The efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CM have been verified by the PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies and confirmed by the real-world studies that followed, including the COMPEL, REPOSE, and CM PASS. OnabotulinumtoxinA not only reduces headache days but also leads to improvement in functioning and quality of life, thereby reducing migraine impact. Data about its pathophysiology, efficacy, and its place in CM treatment in the era of CGRP monoclonal antibodies are reviewed and discussed here.

Real-world effectiveness of Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies compared to OnabotulinumtoxinA (RAMO) in chronic migraine: a retrospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling condition with high prevalence in the general population. Until the recent approval of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (Anti-CGRP mAbs), OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) was the only treatment specifically approved for CM prophylaxis. Direct comparisons between the two treatments are not available so far. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in Italy to compare the real-world effectiveness of Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A. Patients with CM who had received either treatment according to Italian prescribing regulations were extracted from available clinical databases. Efficacy outcomes included the change from baseline in monthly headache days (MHD), MIgraine Disability ASsessment test (MIDAS), and monthly acute medications (MAM) evaluated at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was MHD change from baseline at 12 months. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events (SAE) and treatment discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted models were used for the analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen potentially eligible patients were screened; 183 (86 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 97 BoNT-A) were included. One hundred seventy-one (80 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 91 BoNT-A) and 154 (69 Anti-CGRP mAbs; 85 BoNT-A) patients were included in the efficacy analysis at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A both resulted in a mean MHD reduction at 6 (-11.5 and -7.2 days, respectively; unadjusted mean difference -4.3; 95%CI -6.6 to -2.0; p = 0.0003) and 12 months (-11.9 and -7.6, respectively; unadjusted mean difference -4.4; 95%CI -6.8 to -2.0; p = 0.0002) of follow-up. Similar results were observed after adjusting for baseline confounders. Anti-CGRP mAbs showed a significant MIDAS (-31.7 and -19.2 points, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0296, respectively) and MAM reduction (-5.1 and -3.1 administrations, p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0574, respectively) compared to BoNT-A at 6 and 12 months. No SAEs were reported. One patient receiving fremanezumab discontinued treatment due to arthralgia. Treatment discontinuations, mainly for inefficacy, were comparable. CONCLUSION: Both Anti-CGRP mAbs and BoNT-A were effective in CM patients with Anti-CGRP mAbs presenting higher effect magnitude, with comparable safety. Still, BoNT-A remains a valuable option for CM patients with contraindications to Anti-CGRP mAbs or for frail categories who are candidates to local therapy with limited risk of systemic administration.

Intraarticular botulinum toxin type A versus corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid for painful knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials.

Intraarticular botulinum toxin type A (BTA) has been shown to be effective for painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA), while the efficacy and safety of intraarticular BTA compared to corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) remains unknown. A meta-analysis was performed to compare. A search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to find head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly compare the efficacy and safety between intraarticular BTA and intraarticular corticosteroid or HA for patients with painful KOA. The Cochrane Q test and estimation of I2 were used to assess heterogeneity among studies. After incorporating heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed for data pooling. Overall, six RCTs involving 348 adults with KOA were included. Intraarticular BTA showed similar efficacy with corticosteroid as evidenced by the changes of pain visual analog scale (VAS: -0.35 [-0.97, 0.28]), total Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC: 0.28 [-4.13, 4.69]), and WOMAC for pain (0.64 [-0.42, 1.70]), stiffness (-0.02 [-0.54, 0.50]), and function (0.00 [-2.99, 3.00]). Intraarticular BTA was shown to be more effective than HA in improving pain VAS (-1.31 [-1.97, -0.64]) and WOMAC for pain (-4.81 [-8.73, -0.89]), while the influence on WOMAC for knee stiffness (-1.01 [-4.43, 2.41]) and knee function (-1.86 [-6.71, 2.99]) were similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported. Evidence from pilot RCTs suggests that intraarticular BTA may confer similar efficacy to corticosteroid for KOA, while BTA may be superior to HA for improving knee pain.

The incidence, clinical features, and management of essential infantile esotropia in the United Kingdom. A British Ophthalmology Surveillance Unit (BOSU) study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A national study was undertaken through the British ophthalmology surveillance unit (BOSU) to determine the incidence, presenting features and management of essential infantile esotropia (EIE) in the UK. METHODS: Data from a prospective national observational study of newly diagnosed EIE presenting to clinicians in the United Kingdom over a 12-month period were collected. Cases with a confirmed diagnosis by a clinician of a constant, non-accommodative esotropia ≥20 prism dioptres (PD), presenting at ≤12 months, with no neurological or ocular abnormalities were identified through BOSU. Follow-up data were collected at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 57 cases were reported giving an incidence of EIE of 1 in 12,828 live births. The mean age of diagnosis and intervention were 7.05 ± 2.6 months (range 2-12) and 14.7 ± 4.9 months (range 6.5-28.1), respectively. Management was surgical in 59.6%, botulinum toxin alone in 22.8%, and 17.5% were observed. The preoperative angle of esotropia was smaller in the observation group (P = 0.04). The postoperative angle of esotropia was not statistically significant between botulinum toxin or surgery (P = 0.3), although the age of intervention was earlier in the botulinum group (P = 0.007). Early intervention (before 12 months of age) did not influence the post-intervention motor outcomes between 0 and 10 prism dioptres of esotropia (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of EIE in the UK is considerably lower than reported in other population-based studies. The preferred method of treatment was surgical with earlier intervention in those treated with botulinum toxin. An early age of intervention (<12 months) did not influence motor outcomes.

The role of botulinum neurotoxin BoNT-A in the management of oily skin and acne vulgaris: A comprehensive review.

Oily skin and acne vulgaris are prevalent dermatological conditions with a significant impact on both physical and emotional well-being. Despite numerous available treatments, there is a pressing need for effective, long-term solutions. Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT-A) has emerged as a potential therapeutic option. However, existing reviews in this area are often limited. This review aims to comprehensively assess the use of BoNT-A in managing oily skin and acne vulgaris while addressing gaps in previous publications. It integrates the latest research, clinical trials, and case studies to provide an up-to-date analysis of BoNT-A mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes. The review systematically analyzes existing evidence, critically evaluates study strengths and limitations, and explores potential synergies with other treatments. It also examines the safety profile of BoNT-A and its potential long-term effects. This review uncovers promising insights into how BoNT-A affects oily skin and acne vulgaris, including its ability to regulate sebum production, reduce inflammation, and potentially shrink pore size. It provides a comprehensive overview of relevant studies and clinical trials, detailing their methodologies, protocols, measures, and results. Collectively, these studies show significant reductions in sebum production, increased patient satisfaction, and smaller pores following BoNT-A treatment. In conclusion, this review addresses knowledge gaps and provides a comprehensive analysis of BoNT-A as a therapeutic option for oily skin and acne vulgaris. By consolidating evidence and highlighting areas for further investigation, it guides clinicians and researchers toward more effective, personalized treatments for individuals with these dermatological challenges.

Short-Term Effects of Botulinum Toxin-A Injection on the Medial Gastrocnemius Histological Features in Ambulant Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Longitudinal Pilot Study.

Botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injection is known to exert beneficial effects on muscle tone, joint mobility and gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, recent animal and human studies have raised the concern that BoNT-A might be harmful to muscle integrity. In CP-children, the impact of BoNT-A on muscle structure has been poorly studied, and inconsistent results have been reported. This study was aimed at determining the time course effect of a single BoNT-A administration on medial gastrocnemius (MG) morphology in CP-children. MG microbiopsies from 12 ambulant and BoNT-A-naïve CP-children (age, 3.4 (2.3) years, ranging from 2.5 to 7.8 years; seven boys and five girls; GMFCS I = 5, II = 4 and III = 3) were collected before and 3 and 6 months after BoNT-A treatment to analyze the fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA) and proportion; capillarization; and satellite cell (SC) content. Compared with the baseline, the fCSA decreased at 3 months (-14%, NS) and increased at 6 months (+13%, NS). Fiber size variability was significantly higher at 3 months (type I: +56%, p = 0.032; type IIa: +37%, p = 0.032) and 6 months (type I: +69%, p = 0.04; type IIa: +121%, p = 0.032) compared with the baseline. The higher type I proportion seen at 3 months was still present and more pronounced at 6 months (type I: +17%, p = 0.04; type IIx: -65%, p = 0.032). The capillary fiber density was reduced at 3 months (type I: -43%, NS; type II: -44%, p = 0.0320) but normalized at 6 months. There was a non-significant increase in SC/100 fibers at 3 months (+75%, NS) and 6 months (+40%, NS) compared with the baseline. These preliminary data suggest that BoNT-A induced alterations in the MG of children with CP, which were still present 6 months after BoNT-A injection but with signs of muscle recovery.

Complexing Protein-Free Botulinum Neurotoxin A Formulations: Implications of Excipients for Immunogenicity.

The formation of neutralizing antibodies is a growing concern in the use of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) as it may result in secondary treatment failure. Differences in the immunogenicity of BoNT/A formulations have been attributed to the presence of pharmacologically unnecessary bacterial components. Reportedly, the rate of antibody-mediated secondary non-response is lowest in complexing protein-free (CF) IncobotulinumtoxinA (INCO). Here, the published data and literature on the composition and properties of the three commercially available CF-BoNT/A formulations, namely, INCO, Coretox® (CORE), and DaxibotulinumtoxinA (DAXI), are reviewed to elucidate the implications for their potential immunogenicity. While all three BoNT/A formulations are free of complexing proteins and contain the core BoNT/A molecule as the active pharmaceutical ingredient, they differ in their production protocols and excipients, which may affect their immunogenicity. INCO contains only two immunologically inconspicuous excipients, namely, human serum albumin and sucrose, and has demonstrated low immunogenicity in daily practice and clinical studies for more than ten years. DAXI contains four excipients, namely, L-histidine, trehalosedihydrate, polysorbate 20, and the highly charged RTP004 peptide, of which the latter two may increase the immunogenicity of BoNT/A by introducing neo-epitopes. In early clinical studies with DAXI, antibodies against BoNT/A and RTP004 were found at low frequencies; however, the follow-up period was critically short, with a maximum of three injections. CORE contains four excipients: L-methionine, sucrose, NaCl, and polysorbate 20. Presently, no data are available on the immunogenicity of CORE in human beings. It remains to be seen whether all three CF BoNT/A formulations demonstrate the same low immunogenicity in patients over a long period of time.